.........................................................
If happiness is the goal in life, then enlightenment is the path, which is to say that if you understand everything in the universe perfectly, you can always be happy. Predictions and the decisions we make based off predictions define the trajectory of our lives. Complete knowledge lets us make better predictions and hence, enlightenment leads to happiness.
Experience is happiness. For many people, enlightenment isn’t a good experience. So, they’d rather seek other experiences, but without the enlightenment, they will inevitably make some wrong predictions and that will make them sad.
In some ways, if you think about it, then, enlightenment is a goal too because paths and goals are not fundamentally different. Happiness and enlightenment are merely two sides of the coin, different but essential to each other and hence, the same. While not truly accurate, you could say that enlightenment is happiness.
If happiness is the goal in life, then enlightenment is the path, which is to say that if you understand everything in the universe perfectly, you can always be happy. Predictions and the decisions we make based off predictions define the trajectory of our lives. Complete knowledge lets us make better predictions and hence, enlightenment leads to happiness.
Experience is happiness. For many people, enlightenment isn’t a good experience. So, they’d rather seek other experiences, but without the enlightenment, they will inevitably make some wrong predictions and that will make them sad.
In some ways, if you think about it, then, enlightenment is a goal too because paths and goals are not fundamentally different. Happiness and enlightenment are merely two sides of the coin, different but essential to each other and hence, the same. While not truly accurate, then, you could say that enlightenment is happiness.
May 7th, 2010
by Jeff Lindsay
The goal of living things is to continue living, and so to sanely play an infinite game like that, you could call it happiness, but I think it’s really just being content. Although I forget if it was Plato or Aristotle that viewed art as a means of unrest to drive people towards a better future. You could argue happiness is not moral because it leads to ant-life behavior: stagnation.
The enlightenment side of this is interesting too. We used to think humanity would eventually know everything there is to know in the universe, but we’ve since proved it impossible. We’ve accepted this. But I agree that the predictive aspect of enlightenment is useful in making good decisions… or at least efficient ones. Prediction has nothing to do with effectiveness — the “right” thing to do. I’m biased against prediction in general because I think it’s a bad mode of operation. Stop predicting. Stop acting like you don’t influence the world around you. Stop passively trying to find an advantage. Decide what kind of future you want, and make it happen. Don’t predict, design.
This is begging for the “happiness is bliss” argument, but we’d probably both agree it’s an illusion. True in the short-term, but not in the long-term. And while I think that a teleological, holistic understanding of the world around you allows you to be more “ok” with most things because it all “makes sense,” I don’t think that’s happiness. I think that’s being content, which is what I mentioned is really a key foundation to life (from there you can decide what to be uncontent with as a way to decide your identity and what you stand for).
But happiness is not real. It can be manufactured. You can just choose to be happy. To be around happy people. David Weekly was just talking about how he was so happy to hear that happiness is contagious. It is! And you can choose to be around happy people. You can choose to make the best of a situation. You can choose to avoid ideational traps that we commonly make that leads to unhappiness (for example, avoiding choice doubt).
ANYWAY, I don’t know if I had a point. Just some ideas you inspired me to mention.