Progress on Reverie has been slower than planned because I’ve been spending time on other projects in addition to not coding at all for these five days. Here’s a sneak peak of what Reverie can do.
In a lot of my blogposts, I want to insert an image into the post. What I usually do these days is to place the image in the Dropbox public folder and it immediately gives me a URL (I don’t even have to wait for it to upload which is just awesome). And then the long arduous process of inserting the image into Wordpress begins -

And I have this URL.

I hit the first rectangle-inside-another icon next to “Upload/Insert”.

Now, why do I have to wait for this? You mean, you couldn’t load 1KB worth of JS+HTML beforehand?! Anyway, so here we are.

Why use tabs? Tabs are useful for hiding information when there’s too much of it. But there’s so much whitespace here! Why make the user click again? Click.

Paste into the URL.

“Image Title”? WTF does that mean? Why is it required? (For the HTML nerds out there, accessibility is very important. But why force the user to do it? I’m sure it shouldn’t too tough to figure out a meaningful title from the file name.) Click “Insert into Post” button.

And finally… I have my image! Hooray!

How does image insertion work in Reverie? (Click image for larger view) Well, you paste in a URL and… that’s it. On Wordpress, it takes about 7 user actions.
Writing this post truly sucked. Wordpress sure makes it tough to write anti-Wordpress posts.

Coming soon.

December 27th, 2009
by Gijs
Usable alt text is in 99.99% not deducable from image names. Digital cameras name files numerically (an alt text of “DSC1629″ is clearly not very useful), and screenshots tend to not have great names, either: “Picture 42″ or “Screen shot 2009-12-24 23:59″, depending on Mac OS version, and if people get to do it themselves, they usually don’t choose well either.
Also, note that as far as I can tell from the screenshots you posted, Wordpress uses the title for the, well, title, and the “Caption” as alt text. That’s kind of what it says underneath the field. Oddly enough, alt text isn’t required by WP. And (some of?) your images here (indeed?) have an empty alt text, which is incorrect as the images do not have descriptive text elsewhere, and a useless title text.
December 27th, 2009
by Jeff Walden
You’re behind the times; the recently-released 2.9 adds video insertion by inserting the URL. I think it might do the same for images, but I’m not sure.
December 27th, 2009
by smo
ok, you proved to the world you were able to post images on you wordpress blog ?! wow ! genius ! it was hard though. :P
December 27th, 2009
by seifsallam
there is a theme in Wordpress that have a similar functionality to Tumblr like writing Status, Blog, Quote, and Link.
but i agree that uploading images using Wordpress is very annoying, it needs to be more easy
December 28th, 2009
by Elroy
@Gijs, don’t think its unreasonable to “figure” out the title from the image name. If nothing else works, you could always use the image name as is. Granted, it may not make sense, but it will save at least one step in this oh-so-tedious process.
December 28th, 2009
by Gijs
@Elroy: I was talking about the alt attribute, not the title. A filename just isn’t an acceptable alternative text for an image, nor does it usually include one. The screenshots on this page are great examples (eg. “Picture 160″). Besides, almost all assistive technology will offer you the filename as “information” if you don’t provide an alt attribute, so ‘manually’ providing the filename as alternative text just adds information the AT doesn’t know is fake instead of saying “I didn’t bother describing this image” (which is what omitting it would imply).
I have no idea why WP requires you to add a title attribute.
My preferred UI would just detect that you paste in a URL in the field, turn it into a link, have UI to insert the image/video/applet the link points to into the content directly (I want to be able to link to images without having them automatically showing up in my blogpost), and automatically ask for an alt attribute / alternative content in a dialog (real or website-faked, don’t really care) if the user chooses to change the link into an actual insertion of content, with a “more” button to get you all the other fuss that WP currently shows.
December 28th, 2009
by Phillip OHara
I found this article amusing. I run a blog based off of wordpress at http://hordereview.com (come by and check it out of course 8)). I wish I would have learned a better CMS like Joomla or Drupal because Word Press seems to have problems like the picture editing you mentioned above. Or the vast array of unkept plugins that needs to be wiped from the database. I particularly am ok witht he picture editing I just make my changes and move on. However the addon support is horrible, I understand it is opensource and up to the editor, but when it is clearly not being maintained it should be wiped from the database. I could do an entire Word Press fail blog, but at the same time I am exptremely happy that WordPress is there from me to use free of charge.
January 1st, 2010
by Dave Holowiski
As Jeff said, you need to check out 2.9. It’s not a slam dunk, but if the site the picture is hosted at supports oembed, you can just drop the URL in to your post and WordPress will magically turn it into a picture (or video) Unfortunately it looks like right now dropbox doesn’t support oembed but i bet it will soon. You can see a list of the sites this currently works with over at wordpress.org: http://codex.wordpress.org/Embeds
January 12th, 2010
by Abi Raja
The Author
As far as I know, 2.9 only adds support for a few video sites (and other oEmbed photo sites).
And yeah, I do find it ridiculous that they force the user to type a title, but not the alt text (I made the mistake of confusing the two in my post).